In a statement released via the royal household, Prince Andrew has declared he is giving up his royal titles, such as his dukedom. Here is an overview of what was announced – and what remains unchanged.
Having already withdrawn as a active member of the monarchy in 2019, the prince has currently decided to “take additional measures” and agree to refrain from using the “honor or the awards which have been conferred upon” him.
However, he used the statement to make a point of rejecting – consistent with his past statements – the allegations of misconduct made against him; even though having paid out millions to resolve the legal claim filed by Virginia Giuffre – a settlement in which he accepted no fault and strongly rejected all allegations of wrongdoing.
There has been ongoing scrutiny on the monarchy regarding the allegations against Andrew – particularly after his disastrous television appearance with Emily Maitlis in 2019. He presently states he is acting to protect his relatives from further damage resulting from public speculation.
No. And although this could be dismissed as a simple procedure, it is significant in multiple ways: first, it enables the prince to openly state to have acted honourably in support of the crown. As he said in his statement: “I have chosen, consistent with my past, to put my duty to my family and country first.”
Second, while he has agreed to abstain from using it, the prince keeps his ducal title, as well as the honors the Earl of Inverness and his barony and the prestigious position as a member of the Order of the Garter. Similar to the royal style title, they essentially become dormant.
He remains a prince and eighth in the line of succession. Theoretically, he remains a potential stand-in for the monarch – and may deputize for the king if he is abroad or unwell. However royal officials has indicated that, in practice, he would not be called upon to fulfil this role.
Nonetheless, it is significant that Andrew’s statement indicated the decision was made “in discussion with the monarch”. It appears little doubt that, privately, the royal household pushed for the move in the hope of cutting Andrew loose.
To forcibly remove a dukedom would require legislative action, and would constitute an unprecedented step publicly before the public – it has not occurred to a senior royal in more than 100 years – that it would likely result in further harm to the image for the royals.
The prince remains still a prince. At his birth in 1960, he became such as the son of a monarch. This would only be changed if a letters patent was enacted by the reigning monarch.
The entire procedure might ultimately being drawn-out, meaning the objective of quickly addressing the matter – at least for the royal family’s purposes – may not be achieved.
Embarrassment, likely above all. The announcement represents an effective loss of status he has resisted for a long time.
The prince and his former spouse, Sarah, still live in Royal Lodge, notwithstanding rumoured attempts by the king to persuade his brother to move out of the thirty-room Crown Estate property in the Windsor estate.
Although limited information has been revealed about exactly how much money Andrew has received due to his position, he remains a wealthy individual. Back in 2007, he was able to raise £15m by selling a property that had been a gift from the queen, for example.
The continual series of controversies related to the prince has proved unacceptable for the monarch and other senior royals.
His association with the jailed child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has again in the headlines after it emerged Andrew had told him “we are in this together” in an email dispatched months after he claimed to have ceased contact.
Additionally, there were stories about his connections with an alleged Chinese spy and, this week, excerpts appeared from the posthumous memoir of Giuffre, who died by suicide in April. She claimed Andrew “believed that having sex with me was his entitlement”.
Moreover, the sovereign is due to undertake a significant trip to see the pontiff soon, when he will become the initial British king after Henry the Eighth broke from the Catholic Church in 1534 to worship openly with the pope and head of the Catholic church. He will not have wanted that visit to be overshadowed by more negative headlines about Andrew.
While he said his sister had been “vindicated” by the move, Giuffre’s brother Sky Roberts has told the Times that the prince's style should be revoked for “true justice” to be done.
The anti-monarchist campaign group Republic has additionally stated the move is “too little, too late”, noting: “Andrew remains accused of sexual offences and misuse of position. He should be stripped of all titles and his navy rank and should undergo a legal probe. Not using silly medieval titles is not a punishment that matches the accusations.”
A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in online casino reviews and strategy development.